The Psychology of Genocide

Western Civilization has been the host culture to certain empire builders whose perpetual goal has been domination of the known world.  These hidden forces are composed of a mix of Europeans and aliens.  One of their methods of conquest has been to pit one culture against another.  The expression: "pit one against another" refers to the twisted sport of digging a pit and throwing two animals into the pit and letting them fight it out until one of them is dead. This method has been, and is being used by international power brokers to destroy cultures.  International Corporations use their economic clout in a strategy that places two cultures in the same geographical region; and when a culture looses its regional sovereignty, it crumbles; this is called Genocide. 

Historic examples of geographical genocide would be the slave trade to America; the manipulation of political refugees, whether Asian, Cuban, Haitian etc.; as well as the deliberate economic migrations (of Mexicans to America).  The international corporate strategy of genocide is that all of the cultures that are thrown into the pit will lose, and the corporate chosen "human Race" and its corporate monoculture will be the victor.  However, such a grandiose plan requires a very complex public cover story to conceal this subtle method of ending all natural cultures on Earth.  And so the hidden conqueror must beguile its victims with a psychology to accept genocide.

Genocide:  The deliberate and systematic destruction of a race, political or cultural group.  Genocide is an example of mankind's worst possible behavior; it is the denial of a culture's right to exist, or sometimes it can be the wholesale slaughter of an entire culture.  This crime against civilizations is without question, notoriously heinous, yet it has been allowed to occur and reoccur down through the history of the entire world.  If genocide is so evil and so repulsive, why does society repeat it?   What kind of society would just stand by and watch it happen, over and over again?

Long before the actual genocide is committed, there has to be present, a person or a group of people whom for whatever reason want the destruction of a race, political group or culture.  I will refer to this person or group as a genocidal maniac.   Historically, genocidal maniacs have not been able to commit genocide without at least partial approval from the host society.  There are two methods that a genocidal maniac uses to gain a society's approval.  One method is to control the society through brute force; that was the method used against the fundamentalist Christians in the early days of the U.S.S.R.     You simply kill or imprison all opposition until the rest of the society ceases their resistance to the proposed genocide. 

The second method of gaining a society's approval for genocide is for the genocidal maniac to have an effective control of the media for influencing public opinion.  This requires that the maniac have ownership or control of almost all of the public accessed media.  This near-total control of the media is a prerequisite for genocide.  Such a level of control should be outlawed in all nations, but it is not.  This dangerous type of closed media is in fact the exact condition in America today.  I will not belabor the specifics of that control because it has already been well documented.  Ownership of the media alone is not enough in itself to convince the necessary majority of the host nation to endorse the use of genocide as a social remedy; it requires those media to methodically propagate a psychology of genocide.

Is genocide really possible is the United States?  Most Americans would vehemently deny that any or all of the media held such mental sway over America's progressive society, and would deny that they could ever be convinced to endorse the evil crime of genocide.  However, mankind doesn't really change in its character weaknesses, and history stands as a testimony that enough people can be swayed into repeating the same crimes over and over, including genocide. 

Genocide has reared its ugly head in many forms, from denying a culture its own religion to the attempted murder of an entire people.  Trying to manipulate society toward accepting genocide is equivalent to trying to convince a rational person into committing murder. Therefore, genocide psychology must contain a comprehensive understanding of human psychology.  Such an understanding allows the genocidal maniac to develop psychological techniques that will play upon those human traits year after year, quietly planting the seeds of genocide that with time grow up to bear fruit.  After years of applied indoctrination, a misguided pseudo social force is created that will finally be rallied for genocide.

The psychology of genocide is a scientific media strategy and therefore uses recognizable models, using detectable criteria.  Once a person breaks through the facade of their strategy and is free of its genocidal influence, he can then observe the techniques used by the media.   The purpose here is to reveal some of the techniques being used to gain public approval of their future plans for genocide; techniques that almost always play on the psychological heartstrings of society.  The genocidal maniac is playing the old wolf in sheep's clothing game. 

The genocidal media (network T.V. etc.) brings before the people evidence of what the interpret as a great social injustice, then brings forward its own, well paid, "experts," "scholars" and "commentators" who use psychological techniques to lend credibility toward their desired genocidal conclusion.  Notice: This technique contains a conspicuous absence of any real equal time for the opposition.  Usually any airtime, that is, actual footage of the accused, would be presented as misleading chopped sound bites that have been sandwiched between the artful misinterpretations and erroneous speculation of "rational" media commentators.  Make no mistake about it: genocide psychology is a science.  But as a science, it must use method, and method is detectable, and if you are to prevent any further genocide, you must detect their methods and expose them. 

One recent example of a textbook genocide would be the Davidian religious home in Waco Texas.   Question: Normally, would Americans endorse a lethal, military raid on a religious home that would kill 81 men, women and children?  The immediate answer is no.  However, after many weeks of professionally applied genocide psychology, most Americans, (deny it if you like) were rallying in support of the BATF and FBI murderers.   The Davidian genocide model sadly shows us that even modern "progressive" Americans can be swayed into accepting the mass murder.  The Davidian genocide model, which was observed while in progress by representatives of other "interested" nations, used identifiable methods and techniques to sway the American public into accepting Genocide as the social remedy.  Here are some of those opinion altering media techniques for you to recognize for their use in the future.

Demonize the leader by attacking his morality, attribute him with anti-social behavior and accuse him of horrible crimes.  When this technique is used against cultural preservationists, the label that they most often use to demonize that organization is "hate group."  When you hear the term "hate group" realize that genocide psychology is in progress.  In fact, when you hear the words "experts" and "scholars" in media commentary you should be aware that those "experts" are seeking to convince you using their "credentials" as intimidation.

Present the victims as aggressors.  It always helps to make claims of illegal automatic weapons and weapons of mass destruction.  [This was written in 1997]

Present the victims as being a menace to society.  The Davidians were accused of manufacturing illegal drugs, which like the hate groups label, is a great modern "bogeyman" technique, but the label of "drugs" also served as a legal requirement for the use of Army tanks against civilians.  This "drug hoax" is a very dangerous precedent; with its searches without warrants and other Constitutional abuses along with the use of a Military "drug czar" to excuse the use of the American Army (ipso facto) against American citizens. 

Present children as victims (but kill them later).  This is a real "heartstring" that works well, over and over again.

Present the victims as suicidal.  This sets the stage to accept their eventual deaths and if deemed necessary the genocidal maniac will kill them to prevent their suicide.  This suicide technique also makes a good cover story for denying that any genocide was ever committed.

After these psychological techniques were applied on the naive American public regarding the Davidian situation, along with other subtle innuendo, the government evaluation was made that America was ready to accept genocide.  They moved the normally "willing to go battle front" media several miles back, and then committed genocide with approval from John Q. Public all the way up to the President of the United States.  Compare the media's reaction to this governmental holocaust with the media's intolerant reaction to the government's Watergate burglars.  The conspicuous concern or lack of concern by the media in these two examples is indicative of their complicity in the genocidal agenda.  The Davidian genocide model also provided an American "test tube" for post-genocidal damage control.  It also served as a microcosm of a much larger project planned for America.

Genocide, like all crimes, must have a motive.   The motive of Genocide is found in its definition, which is, the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political or cultural group.    The media's obvious favorable propagation of interracial marriage reveals they have a pro-active agenda of racial genocide.  The media's pro-Federal Government, and anti-Constitution bias indicates its " has a pro-active political agenda.  The media's immoral programming indicates they have a pro-active anti-cultural agenda. 

The motive of the genocidal maniac is power: power over all peoples and over all religions.  But to accomplish this, they must dismantle all traditional cultures and establish, as supreme, their Corporate Mono-culture.  Genocide, as employed using well-developed methods, can be achieved slowly, with the approval of the majority of Americans.  But genocide is never totally accepted by everyone.  Cultural preservationists have always appeared on the scene to challenge the deceitful methods of genocide.  What is loosely called the Patriot Network and Southern movements are current challenges to the planned genocide. 

Cultural preservationists are the loyal opposition to the genocidal maniac.  And so, instead of a quiet, unrecorded elimination of all natural cultures, a conflict presents itself and we have a bang instead of a fizzle.  The resources of the genocidists are the media, the Federal government, and international corporations.  The resources of the cultural preservationists are truth, courage, dignity, morality, loyalty, brotherhood, dedication and conviction of principles.  And they are not well financed.  The odds against preserving natural cultures seem insurmountable.   Then why is there continued opposition?  Simple, some Americans are not so naive as to ever expect a real and lasting peace from such an historic oppressor.  Our culture seeks liberty while theirs destroys it.   We will never surrender and Mr. American Voter had better understand that and not approve or be party to their planned violent and suppressive genocide.  John Q Public should consider that any government attempt for our genocide, may start with some degree of social approval, but will end with tyrannical brute force.  Do not blame those who resist this brute, blame the brute and those who have been duped by a psychology of genocide.

Strategy dictates that the genocidal maniac must defeat resistance as it appears on the scene.  In America, their foremost opponents happen to be the people with the largest underground media who keep very current with the latest machinations of the maniac.  The foremost opposition to the genocidal maniac is the loose knit remnant of the European culture called the Patriot Network.  Understand that, as a fact. 

The genocidal maniac of today is actually the product of a direct continuum from its historic, genocidal antecedents.  They have certainly not gained all of their power in just one generation; their mono-cultural plan for a one world corporate plantation has been passed down to them along with the necessary resources (media and funding) for its eventual implementation.  The foremost resistance to genocide today has the same resources as their antecedents: truth and courage.  However, the resistance has not survived because of financial planning and political skullduggery, as has supported the genocidal maniac.  The resistance to tyranny has continued down through the centuries because liberty is our inalienable quest.  In this light, it is clear to see that this is an historic battle between the organizational skills of evil, and the spontaneous courage of independent volunteer defenders of liberty.

The two primary components of this historic resistance are strategically attacked by specific media psychologies that target Race and Religion.  I would estimate that 98% of the Patriot Network, as well as its historic predecessors, are White, and almost as high a percent are Christian.  These two predominant traits have prompted the media to make "Race" and "Religion" the front lines in this psychological warfare.  But because most Americans are White Christians, the media must use great skill to subtly dismantle the Western culture, by using strategies that result in "racial denial," and "Christian isolation."

Christian isolation is a media technique that promotes their own stepchild, mainline Christianity, as being legitimate and acceptable, with its tolerance of everything in the corporate agenda, while isolating as being extremist, any Christian resistance to the corporate agenda.  The media will patronize members of mainline Christianity in an effort to sway them toward rejecting the more vocal Christian resistance as being radicals.  This technique is only part of a full line of psychological associations designed to undermine pro-cultural Christianity in the minds of lukewarm Christians.  One of the most abused names given to non-conforming Christian sects is to label them as a  "cult."  It was Cult Awareness Network that fed the Davidians to the rabid BATF.   Another popular genocide psychology used by the media against the liberty fighters is to label its theology as "hate."  This, like other genocide techniques, is used over and over again to burn the image into the sleepy brain of John Q Public.  

Racial denial is a technique used to encourage Americans of European ancestry to associate their race with certain historic evils.  This technique is obvious to observe because it must be repeated over and over again.  The abusive labels for this method are "racist" or "bigot."  The White man is portrayed as blight on the Earth, while all other races are portrayed as moving as one in harmony with the nature.  The Earth itself and all of its peoples are portrayed as victims of the Europeans.  Racial denial is a psychological doctrine that must be accepted by the masses of White Americans in order for the genocidal maniac to silence his historic and formidable opponent, whom he knows one day will surface again and they will be White and Christian.   The White Christian resistance will try to appeal to his lukewarm kindred with ideas about Christianity's resistance to tyrants and give reminders of the great European social models with their moral laws.  But the genocidal maniac already knows our historic strategy and so their media has filled the minds of Americans with racial and religious land mines (buzz words and bogeymen).

There you have a basic explanation of the strategy and methods behind the psychology of genocide.  History shows that genocide genocide is first directed against the "Men of Liberty."  A true tyrant cannot even let a small pocket of liberty holdouts exist within his realm.    Wimps hide and men stand! 

The psychology of genocide is not confined to the news media.  It is more prevalent in the entertainment media, which strategically, is also owned by the same group of genocidal maniacs.  When John Q Public comes home each night to relax and let down his defenses he wants to watch some escapism T.V., he is more vulnerable to accepting a genocide psychology watching fiction than watching the news.  The genocidal maniac knows this and takes full advantage of it.  In fact, it is really much easier to deliver agenda-psychology with a literary license than it is for them to distort the news.  

Remember though, the need for repetition makes their techniques easier to observe.  And the two main targets remain the same, Race and Religion.  Here are some examples that you should have already noticed, examples that are designed to instill a feeling of racial or religious denial.

The stereotype of the evil Nazi almost always has blond hair and blue eyes that implies the identification of evil to a particular race and not to the empire-building tyrants of the world.

Depicting the story's non-White characters as being victims of pseudo-intellectual, arrogant, pompous White supremacists is a regular theme.

The violent White aggressor is strong and young, while his non-White victims are old or weak but are amazingly brave in the face of life threatening bigotry.  The non-White victim is usually inflicted with a long, heart felt, beating and abuse but in the end gains the moral victory, and the heart of the viewer.

Only non-Whites can have an affinity with nature, Whites can only be destructive to nature.  Forget about Frost and Thoreau.  Consider the genocidal gem in the cartoon Pocahontas as she sings to America's new White European oppressors: "How high does the Sycamore grow, you cut them down so you'll never know" or when this Wonderful World of Eisner film soundtrack of Pocahontas singing to John Smith says: "Do you think you own what ever land you land on."  Quite and indictment against the Europeans and the song continues to our unsuspecting cartoon loving children: "You think the only people who are people, are the people who look and think like you."  How many European American children were moved toward racial denial?  And that song, "the Colors of the Wind," sung by the first Black Miss America, won a Grammy, how synchronized.

They give the general presentation of Whites as rich and non-whites as poor.

The use of the "wise old" Indian, Chinese, Jew or Black; but never the wise old "honky."

T.V. commercials with four children: one Black, one Asiatic, one Brown variable, and one, usually red headed, White.  However, notice a real preference toward the Brown.   Those children were hired because of their race - racism. 

Notice the conspicuous lack of stories of White slaves or criminal racism directed against Whites.

News media segments of "American Profiles" usually champion the non-White "underclass" as overcoming the great odds that were put in place by the Whites.  I find it very odd that the liberals feel that they must subsidize non-White dignity and pride by seeking out and profiling "role models" for them.  Such pandering reveals the media's disbelief in the actual abilities of non-Whites.  This reveals that the media believe in White supremacy.  Also notice the role model commercials offered to our children - and count their earrings.

There are countless stories of the White man stealing the Indian lands.  In reality it was the land stealing, buffalo massacring corporate railroad-Federal government co-op.  Can you see why the non-Whites hate us; can you see how they are being led to accept our genocide?  Can you see why our unsuspecting White youth abandon their heritage?

Science fiction dramas will always allot several episodes for "bigots in outer space" which are parodies of aliens being oppressed by powerful supremacists with historic references to primitive twentieth century racists with the desired implication that the racists were White, leaving the White viewer pondering: "Will we ever learn?"

Children of all races holding hands in a circle and singing happily to show how the world could live in harmony if we would all deny our racial cultures.  If the circle of children were made up of just Whites, or just Blacks, or just Asiatics, the implication is that it would somehow be evil.  The real evil is in the media getting innocent children to sing their song of genocide.

Religious Blacks are always portrayed as almost Saint-like, while religious Whites are portrayed as hypocrites. 

The Statue of Liberty and the melting pot doctrine - give us your poor derelicts - are used to promote the corporate monoculture's preferred brown super race while practicing genocide.  Why does the Empire builder prefer non-Whites?  Because they are easier to control. 

The media will break out the sheets and burn a cross as often as practical, and make as many films of Nazis as lost profits will permit to instill racial guilt and encourage racial denial.  And remember, an actor is a person who will say anything for money (same definition as politician).

You should notice the obvious and deliberate lack of a definition for the word "racist."  If the media wanted to end racism, wouldn't they at least go to the trouble to define it?  There is a reason that they don't.  If they defined racism, their definition would reveal that most people are racist to a degree and that the media is practicing genocide.

Confederate soldiers are seen as morally confused bigots while the Black Yankee soldiers are virtuous and honorable.  

Another, more subtle form of media genocide is the sin of omission; things not written, things not said.   Every culture has a history.  And when there is a deliberate effort to dismantle or erase that history, that effort is evidence of attempted genocide.  Today the government-corporate media is writing and erasing America's official history, deleting more and more of the history made by Europeans, why?  Genocide!

Then there is the "science" verses "Christian" hoax, which presents science and Christianity at odds, when actually they are not.  Did you ever notice that it's never science verses Buddhism or Confucianism?  The attack is against Christianity. The media tends to "imply" its way around the truth, in its quest for genocide.  The media implies that Christianity is incompatible with science as to offer the student a choice of either-or.   This argument is as old as atheism.  They attempt to show how the Church historically fought scientific advances, such as - the Earth is round - or fought the Copernican system of how the Earth revolves around the sun.  The defense that reveals this allegation against Christianity to be a hoax is that nowhere in the Bible does it claim that the Earth is flat or that the sun revolves around the Earth.  And if the genocidal historians wants to blame the Church for forcing Copernicus to renounce his correct scientific thesis, then I suggest that they find that particular "Church" and blame them for enforcing a non-Christian doctrine; and don't paint Christianity and every other Christian with such a genocidal brush.

The scientific community is not a monolithic foundation of truth in itself.  It has the same problem as Christianity: false teachings within the legitimate body.   Science is based on fact.  A theory is not fact.  A theory may use some scientific facts in its supposition, but supposition is to science what superstition is to religion.  And just as religion has its false prophets, science has its false theorists.  There is absolutely no conflict between Christianity and the facts of science.  Metaphysics is the science of creation, but it falls into the realm of philosophy, and is not to be proven with absolute hard material facts but only with inferences, which has its place, but let's not claim genocidal theories to be physical scientific fact.  

             When the genocidal maniac recruits scientific theorists and portrays them as factual scientists, you can expose their hoax by simply diagramming their sentences for analysis.  I will paraphrase an example that I heard on Public Television.  "The creationists believe that man was created as man and did not evolve from the monkey.  The scientific community prefers to base its findings on fact, and rejects the Creationist Theory."  What they could not say was that they had scientific factual proof that man evolved from ape, but they implied it, while labeling Creationism as a theory, which it is, a religious theory, for that is the nature of "Faith."  Notice that the anti-Christian liberals have removed the "theory" description from their own pet doctrine of evolution.  It is sometimes tempting to believe that liberals did indeed, evolve from apes, but I fight that temptation.

The liberals' evolution hoax has some revealing implications that, I would think, should be appalling to Blacks.  If man did evolve from monkey, then humans would likely reflect that certain races are more evolved than others.  If you were to apply a scientific observation using the two primary races, White and Black; placing the monkey and the White and Black side by side; place the monkey as the original animal and place it on the left; beside the monkey in the middle position, place which ever race looks more likely to be the middle man in this evolutionary line; then place the one who scientifically looks least like the monkey, on the other end.   Monkeys do not have blond hair and blue eyes or white skin, and so the Black race has more physical similarities to the monkey and becomes the evolutionary "middleman."  And so, the most obvious yet never spoken tenant of the evolution theory is that the White race has evolved further and so is superior to the Black race.  So it should be evident that evolutionists are White supremacists, and they are teaching White supremacy in our public schools.  In contrast to the liberal evolution doctrine of White supremacy, 95% of the White Patriots regards evolution as a hoax. 

The analysis of sentence structure is helpful not only in exposing their "science hoax" but also in exposing their news presentations as well.  Also notice the likeliness of the media's total agreement against "Patriot" issues when issues are discussed among their anointed pool of "experts" and "scholars."  If it were an issue involving a Democrat verses Republican, both sides are represented, but Patriots are never represented in "Patriot" discussions.  It is also helpful to recognize the use of innuendo as a literary form. 

The genocidal media does not confine its assault only on the cultural components of race and religion; they remain true to the textbook definition of Genocide.  They maintain a deliberate and systematic dismantling of other major (mostly European) cultural components.  One of the most primary components of a culture is the family, and we have watched the media cheer leading every aspect of family disintegration. 

A major anti-family campaign of note was the women's lib media assault.  The nucleus of family cohesion and morality has traditionally been the woman.  So in the late sixties, the media began its multi-million dollar campaign to remove as many women as possible from the cultural home front in exchange for precious corporate careers with its materialistic rewards.  This ploy also served to expand the U.S. family income to support the hyperinflation created by the corporate oil embargo hoax of 1974.  The cost of living quickly doubled penalizing the cultural stronghold families whose wives and mothers did not march to the beat of the corporate drum. 

The media pushes the lie that conservatives suppress women to keep them in their place.  However, to the contrary, the Patriot movement has countless women on the front lines.   Women join the fight because they see the social cost of the corporate genocide of the family.  Every woman in the Patriot movement is appreciated.  It is the corporations that are making sure that women are "in their place," every weekday morning at 8:30.  And it has been corporate health care that has inflated the cost of health insurance, so much so, that workingwomen say that they are working for the insurance, that's sick.  And isn't it odd that a women's corporate desk job is more likely to have better insurance coverage than the man can get.  And the genocidal media's hypnotic repetition of the battle cries for free enterprise is a euphemism for genocide to traditional small businesses and families.

Their strategies have been well thought out, but they do not escape observation.  The genocide of European morality by corporations needs no introduction, you have witnessed its expansion and are presently living among the culture that it spawned.  Like Plato said, civilizations have cycles, they start out good but end with decadence.  The genocidal corporations know this cycle, promote this cycle, and profit from it.  The fall of civilizations can be measured in many ways.  One method of measuring where you are in the "Fall" timetable is determined by where we are on the scale of social corruption: the corruption of the men; then the corruption of the women; and then the corruption of the children; then its time for the puritans to move West again. 

There was a time that I can remember when mostly, only the men were somewhat corrupt; there was certain language that you just did not use in mixed company.  That culture has all but vanished.  How did that genocide occur?  The obscene words that men chose not to speak in front of our women, the media did.  And the dumb men folk did not pick up on it.  Their women were being taken captive into another culture.  Many in the Patriot movement still have not learned this lesson.  If "they" make an "R" rated movie about a warrior Scot, patriots will give their money to our enemies to go see it.   Most patriots, like most people, feel that they are not affected by their viewer participation in the moral degeneracy of media genocide; but your language says otherwise.   Evil has always been among us, but our culture historically has gone to great lengths to contain and restrict its proliferation, and historically when we have failed to contain evil, our nations have fallen from within.

And then, after our culture sat back and watched our women violated, the media turned their perverted eye to our children.  Why do you think that the movie rating system invented the "PG 13" rating?  The "R" rating was designed to pervert adults, or those over 17 years old.  And once they perverted the adults, they needed to take some of the "R" material and present it to the younger children, which they did, under the banner of PG 13, and they did it without a cultural fight.  The media is very strong in their opposition to the immorality of "racism," but it seems that when it comes to the immorality of filmmaking, they can't pervert our children fast enough.  Their "politically selective" morality is a fraud.  They have changed the meaning of the word "perverted" to be the meaning of the word "adult," the movie is for adults only, but really it is for perverts. 

             There are other media tricks used to push their genocidal perversion, such as pretending that cable or satellite T.V. is not subject to the control of local standards.   Yea, we fell for that one too.  Then, there is the V-chip and T.V. ratings; but once the ratings are accepted, it will be their excuse for a new wave of filth to be unleashed upon our naive and gullible cultural corpse.  And through it all, they are telling us that there is nothing we can do about it, free speech and all that, and you believe it.  And haven't you been repeatedly told that if you don't like it, you can turn it off, no one is making you watch it.  You have heard that over and over, haven't you?  This method is used so they can cultivate an anti-cultural delinquent society within the midst of a moral one, a technique that has demoralized our neighborhoods and isolated the remaining cultural holdouts.  It seems to be working.

Remember the early Greek philosophy that claimed that it is the duty of a community to enforce virtue; that goes beyond the individual turning his T.V. off if he is offended, it is the entire community that is offended.  The European culture is a culture that developed community Virtue and that is a cultural jurisdiction.  But the media's plan is to seize our cultural jurisdiction, which is another plank of their genocide platform.  You see, one of the main components of a culture is region.   A culture must control its own region to control its destiny.  Our control of community standards is one of the last crumbling bastions of our cultural jurisdiction and it is this same genocidal media that chooses to hide its demoralizing actions behind our First Amendment but has attacked our other standards again and again and again.

Cultural genocide is all but complete.  It has been said that the White race has always been just one generation away from extinction.  The same can be said for our Euro-Culture.  In fact they already control the next generation, our children, that is obvious in our children's denial of their historic culture. The only remnant of our culture left intact, is the Vision within our own minds.  Hold fast!   What awaits our mono-cultural, genocidal successor nation is not peace on Earth, but a Great Tribulation.  The fall of these United States will be worst than the plague, worst than Dresden, worse than slavery.  We must make every effort to do now, what our moral ancestors had done or attempted to do in the past.  We must separate our future from their world empire.  Even if both futures are dreadful, I do not want to live with tyranny's losers.   If we are all to suffer, I don't even want to suffer with them.

If we forfeit our Western Culture to genocidal maniacs, then we will be forfeiting our liberty, the liberty of future generations, our morals, our race, our history, our Christianity, our self-respect, our souls and in some cases, our names in the Lambs book of life.  We can no longer survive separated by the heathen among us; we must work toward our last Family Reunion so that we will at least once more be free, God willing, on our own Sovereign soil, however short lived that may be.  The alternative is absolutely unacceptable.  We cannot postpone our freedom into the distant future, and pass our work off to our children or grandchildren who without our intervention will be culturally disenfranchised and unable to preserve what they never knew.  Look closely at the signs of the times; this work is for our generation. 

Whenever we make a stand for our culture, the genocidal maniac makes every attempt to associate our cultural preservation efforts with racism, just as they will attack our attempts at cultural preservation as being a thinly veiled cover for racism.  But if that were true, if we were simply a racial group, then we would welcome the efforts of all of our White brothers, Bill Clinton and Bob Dole and 100 million others; but we do not.  Race is a component of most cultures, but it is not the culture itself; being White is not enough and it never has been.  The essence of Western Man cannot be defined by only his race, any more than the Chinese culture.  Western Man is not hiding his racism behind his culture; we are presenting our culture, including our race, as being something worth saving, at least worthy of that consideration.  I venture to say that it is the genocidal maniac who is trying to hide his own heinous atrocities behind the altruistic facade of a quest for multi-cultural harmony.

We are in a spiritual war, but the battle before us now, has been fought over and over again.  In this battle, it must be understood that there are two opposing forces: cultural preservationists verses genocidal powers.  And the only reason that the American public remains duped regarding the true aspects of this battle is because one side (the genocide) controls the media.  The effect of our former battles has resulted in our Westward treks to avoid genocide, but going west is no longer an option.  It is our generation alone, unique in all of our history, which stands between the preservation of our cultural remnant, and genocide.  The time has come for us to come forward.