The History of  Western Man

The essence of Western Man is far too complex for it to be described as simply "the White Race," yet race cannot be discarded as if it were of no effect.  "Western" history is the history of the nations of the White race.  Ancient Western history also includes the history of nations that are presently not racially White, but were White in earlier centuries.  Western Man can be best understood by studying the history of this family of nations.  Racial history is all too often lost in national histories, often lost for political reasons.  Race has played a major role in the development of nations as well as the destruction of nations, and yet so often, history has been portrayed as being only political or religious events with the racial overtones being swept out of sight. 

The study of the Western "race" is a combination of history, archaeology, philosophy and even religion.  Sometimes there is a conflict of data analysis between these sources.  Subject bias can affect ones interpretation of data.  A case in point of conflicting "data interpretation" found between history and religion is that in some of the historical dates of archaeology there is a conflict with the dates written in the Bible, dates which were added to the Bible by our latter day scholars.  So in some ancient cases, a general time frame is used to cover the events - with less focus on exact times.

Western Man, in contrast to the aboriginal man, is a builder of Civilizations, and has created certain artifacts that can identify his historic presence in different locations.  Determining the historic locations of Western Man can also be accomplished by the discovery of his skeletal remains that are used to confirm his particular racial features.  And so the beginning of Western History, and the beginning of Western Man, as well as the beginning of the "White" race will be found where the oldest Western artifacts are located. 

The oldest Western artifacts were found at Cappadocia, which is in modern day Turkey.  Cappadocia is located about 300 miles West of the Ararat Mountains, where the Biblical Ark of Noah came to rest.  The date that the Bible scholars put on that event is 2349 B.C.  The date that the archaeologists put on the Cappadocia settlement is 3800 B.C.   I apologize that I cannot settle that dispute for you.  There are theories attempting to resolve this.  One theory would be that the Bible Scholars are off in their dates.  Another is that the Carbon 14 dating fluctuates too much to be accurate (or, that the dates vary due to both being inaccurate).  Yet another would be that Cappadocia was a settlement of Adamics unaffected by the flood.  Another would be the Angelic or "space visitors" scenario, which I reject because of Cappadocia's limited technology.

  I cannot present all of these views as credible, so I must choose one presentation.  Based on my best interpretation of archaeology, the Bible, history, and traditions, I choose that the date determined by the Bible Scholars for the landing of Noah's ark in the Ararat Mountains is not accurate, and correlate that date with that of the archaeologists.  I do not change any other Bible dates.

I will be referring to "Western Man" as the "White Man" or "Aryan."   Some say that "Aryan" is a language family and not a "race."  I will present my reason to disagree. 

The History of a People:

Noah was floating away from a society that was so evil that God chose to destroy it.  While floating adrift during this flood, the Bible, Zechariah Chapter five, says in Zechariah's vision of the bushel of wheat (ephah) which represents the remnant of Adamic man in the Ark: "And behold, there was lifted up a talent of lead: and this is a woman that sitteth in the midst of the ephah"..."to build it an house in the land of Shinar: and it shall be established..."   The Ark landed in the Mountains of Ararat.  Out of those mountains runs the Euphrates River into a land called Cappadocia.  It is there that archaeologists have located the oldest Aryan artifacts dating back to about 3800 B.C.   It is most probable that Noah lived out his remaining, post-flood 350 years in Cappadocia.  According to the epics of the (Aryan) Goths, who lived in the area of the Danube (Germany), Cappadocia is the home of their first King, the one they call the founder of civilization.  Sumerian (Mesopotamian) history also traces its beginnings back to Cappadocia. 

The artifacts found at Cappadocia were found on top of an earlier, unrelated, primitive Neolithic settlement.   There is no archaeological transition from the previous primitive settlement to the "Copper age" settlement of Noah.  Archaeologists say that the newer settlement [Noah] was a pre-developed civilization that came to Cappadocia and settled over the ruins of a non-related aboriginal settlement.  The historic and archaeological origin of the Aryan or Western Man is Cappadocia, and it is from here that Western Civilization began. 

Noah had three sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth who settled there with Noah.  Remember, Noah lived 350 years after the flood.   As time went by, some of his descendants moved away.  Cappadocia is bordered on the east by the Euphrates River, which runs south for over 1000 miles to empty into the Persian Gulf.  Before Noah divided the children of Noah (in Cappadocia) into the three "nations" of his sons, there was an early migration of certain sons of Noah down the Euphrates in the year 3700 B.C. who settled at Sumer.  Sumer became the first great Western Civilization.  I cannot find any grounds to call these people exclusively of Shem, Ham or Japheth, it could have been any one of them or some of all three.  The Sumerians did have a legend of a great flood and of a serpent.  It was these first arrivals, who brought the center of Adamic civilization to the Plains of Shinar.  These are the Aryan founders of the Empires of the Western World. 

Prior to Sumer, there was no "writing."  Primitive man had drawn pictures in caves and such, but had not developed the written word.  The Sumerians started with pictographs and then added marks for phonic sounds and so it was in Sumer, by the hand of the Aryans, that the written word began.   By the year 3500 B.C., the Sumerians had developed a very modern nation.  They drained the swamps, built irrigation systems, and practiced flood control.  They had written laws and rights, property settlements, with a very developed social system.  The gave us the sixty second minute, the sixty minute hour and the twenty-four hour day.  The wheel was invented in Sumer. They also made toys for their children, of the same variety found in Cappadocia.  Sumer became the model for other Adamic civilizations that followed.  The first capital, of the first Sumerian King, was Urhu, which means city of the Hawk or Eagle, and it is worth mentioning that the empires that followed used the Eagle as a national symbol, whether it was Egypt, Rome, Nazi Germany or the United States.  

Now back to Cappadocia, where we have a conflict among the sons of Noah (Genesis 9:18) that involved one of Ham's sons: Canaan.  After which Noah cursed Canaan, and then blessed Shem and Japheth.  The children of Ham became the nations that later caused so much trouble with the nations of Shem and Japheth, wherever they went.  The sons of Ham became the Hittites, the Amorites the Canaanites, and founded cities like Sodom and Gomorrah, also among Ham's descendants was Nimrod.  The children of Japheth divided among themselves, the "isles of the gentiles," they went west to the Mediterranean.  The children of Shem went east, ten miles past the Euphrates River, to Cappadocia's eastern border, the Tigris River, and followed that south.  The Children of Ham followed down the Euphrates.  And some of Noah's children stayed in Cappadocia.

The sons of Shem slowly established settlements as they went down the Tigris.  Nineveh was a major settlement that later became the capital of Assyria.  Asshur was another major settlement on the Tigris, named after Shem's son Asshur.  In fact the nation of Assyria is translated as the "land of Asshur" or the land of the sons of Shem.  Assyrians are the "sons of Asshur" therefore also the sons of Shem.  Archaeologists and historians say that Assyrian history begins around 3000 B.C.  Further down the Tigris, the Sons of Asshur founded Akkad and then finally down to the city of Ur, where the Tigris and Euphrates join to enter the Persian Gulf (Kuwait).  By this time, the population of Semites moving down the Tigris combined with the Hamites coming down the Euphrates put heavy immigration woes on the small yet advanced Empire of Sumer.  The Sumerians chose to seek a new location for their Empire Building.

In 3100 B.C., the Royal Dynasty of Sumer moved to what we call Phoenicia, and established the first Phoenician Dynasty.  They continued to move south and west and decided to make Egypt the new home for their kingdom.  This historical time period is called Egypt's Archaic Period, the time of the first Egyptian Dynasty.  Egypt's first King was named Menes.  Menes easily conquered the aboriginals because his soldiers had metal weapons; he brought the Bronze Age to Egypt.  The Sumerians also brought their pictographs to Egypt.  In one of Menes' inscriptions in Egypt, he used a mystic pictograph that is also Sumerian: the "Eye over the Throne."  And so this Aryan Empire had the "Eagle" and the "Eye" in its symbols, as does the U.S. Seal.  There are many scenarios concerning these subjects, but I must stay within my subject.

By 2750 B.C., the increased immigration pressure on the Sumerians remaining in Mesopotamia, by the Hamites and Semites caused a massive migration of these Sumerian Aryans to India.  The Aryans in India, who were the early Hindu or Brahmans, went all the way to India's Island tip of Sri Lanka, but concentrated in the Ganges Valley, just below the Himalaya Mountains.  This influence was the source of the later "wisdom of Tibet."  They developed the Sanskrit language, in which "Arya" means "the Noble Race."  Thus, Arya, (or Aryan) by definition is a race and not a language.  In the old Indian Sagas, the Gods are described as being "blond," in fact "Hari" means "Blond." 

By 2700 B.C., those Sumerians who did not go to India migrated to Egypt.  But by this time, the first and second dynasties of Egypt had ended.  It was around 2780 that the third dynasty came to power.  They were still Aryan, but had a slight change of religion.  The first dynasty religion was that of the Sun god Re, which has its roots in Sumer.  It was the third dynasty, under King Djoser, around 2650 B.C., when the first "step" pyramid was built (before the Tower of Bable).   Egypt was becoming the successor to, or continuation of, the Sumerian Super Power.  But what became of the first and second Egyptian dynasties that were the Sumerian purists? 

Around 2700 B.C. a new Civilization was just beginning on the Mediterranean island of Crete, that ancient, advanced civilization that, until it was rediscovered in the twentieth century, was once only known as the legendary "Minos."  That confirmed the true story behind the myth of Europa.  It was on Crete that the myth of Europa was played out.  The archaeological findings place Minos on the cutting edge of civilization for that time, equal to Egypt.  The critical significance of Crete, as expressed in the Europa myth, is that it began the transfer of the Aryan Empire builders from the Asian-African continent over to Europe.  But the Greek Empire comes considerably later, around 600 B.C.  The legendary end of Menes, King of Egypt and Minos, King of Crete was that they sailed west and never returned.  This legend confirms the Egyptian-Aryan-Crete connection and speculates as to the origin of the South and Central American mystery civilizations.

After the Sumerians emigrated from Sumer to Egypt and India, Mesopotamia was left with the Semites on their side of the Tigris, and the Hamites on the Euphrates.  In 2650 B.C., Sargon of Akkad joined Sumer and Akkad into a new Semitic Kingdom that conquered territory all the way to the Mediterranean, and also went up to Cappadocia to protect the Semites that had remained there.  There was an increase of Aryan migrations to Sumer that caused that time period to be Sumer's golden age. 

Babylonia is the country between the two rivers, and Babylon later became its capital city.  Bible Scholars put the date of 2250 B.C. on the "tower of Babylon." History tells us that 50 years later the Hamitic Amorites conquered Sumer and Akkad and set up their Babylon Dynasty.  And the Hittites, the brother tribe to the Amorites, were also gaining in regional power with their capital being in Cappadocia.  The Hittites also had their legend of the great flood.  The nations of Ham were the leaders in miscegenation (race mixing) with the Africans, from which we get the myth that the Black race came from Ham; but actually, the browns came from Ham, in greater numbers that the from his Aryan cousins.

If Ham did not create the Black man, then the question must be asked: Did Noah's flood kill all life on Earth except that which was on the ark?  I believe the Bible is correct, but misread.  The word "Earth" in those critical verses can mean field, country or land.  My Bible says that the water was fifteen cubits upward, that is twenty-two and a half feet, which is a terrible flood that would kill all of the inhabitants and creatures in that Earth (land), but it does not seem likely that twenty-two feet of water flooded the entire planet.  I only mention this "theological" question because it is a major factor in the history of our race, and how, as White men traversed the globe, some mingled with the aboriginals to create the brown man.  In fact it is a sad testimony to us that brown people with Aryan features today occupy our ancient nations.

The golden age of Babylonia, which was started under Sargon, 2650 B.C., and lasted until 2360 B.C., was contemporary with Egypt's greatest age of building pyramids.  The Assyrian royal library contained over 200,000 clay tablets.  Egypt and Babylonia were the two leading Aryan civilizations of that time.  But when the Amorites gained power in Babylon, Babylon was dumbed down and Egypt clearly took the lead in libraries, law, science, building, commerce, and the arts. 

Hittite power began around 2300 B.C., and ended around 717 B.C.   Hittite means "sons of Heth" who was the son of Canaan who was the son of Ham.  They controlled the lands from Mesopotamia to Cappadocia and struggled with Egypt for the control of Phoenicia.  Sidon, a port city in Phoenicia, is also the name of Heth's brother.  Abraham's grandson Esau married a Hittite, which distressed his father Isaac, and his mother Rebekah.  The Hittites began to supply Europe, mainly Greece, with their new race, a Mediterranean race, which was later, temporarily run out of Greece.

         Around 1600 B.C., the Aryan (Semitic) Assyrians began to overpower the Hittites and Amorites until Assyria became the Aryan super power.  Assyria would later capture Israel as well as Egypt.  But Assyria would stay busy for centuries fighting with the Hittites.  And the young nation of Israel was continually fighting against non-Aryan spin off Hamitic tribes, like the Philistines, Edomites, Amorites and so forth.

The Aryan position in the world by 1200 B.C. was; strongholds in Assyria and Babylon, losing ground in Egypt, holding steady in Persia, cautious in India, controlling the Mediterranean Islands, and a growing population in the Danube area, sparsely scattered across Europe.  

So, the Aryan movement went from Cappadocia to Sumer, then to Egypt, then north again to Assyria and then in 612 B.C., the Medes and Scythians and Babylonians (all Aryan) captured the Assyrian capital of Nineveh.  Then by 539 B.C., the Aryan, Cyrus the Great conquered all of them making Persia the new Aryan super power.  This brings us back to Cappadocia (in Turkey). 

The new route for Western migrations was the route to Europe around the Black Sea.  Clockwise around the Black Sea puts you at the crossroads of East-West trade: Byzantium (Constantinople or Istanbul).  Go to Europe from Cappadocia counter clockwise around the Black Sea and you go through the Caucasus Mountains; that was the main entry point for Aryans into northern Europe; this gave Aryans the name "Caucasian."  It is this limited geo-racial identification, based on only one of our historical locations, which prevents me from accepting "Caucasian" as the name of our race.  The same "word choice" problem is found in the use of the geo-racial word "Nordic" as the name of our race.  In an academic effort to confuse the race issue, the present people of India have been placed into the Caucasian racial category, because of certain Aryan features found among those brown people, also because of their use of the Aryan language "Sanskrit."  But they are just shadows of where we have been, and are not of the Aryan race.  

In 500 B.C., Aryan Persia was holding back the migration tide from Asia and Africa to Europe, but Persia itself, was paying the price of that non-Aryan immigration.  Across the Aegean Sea from Byzantium was Greece.  Greece was not so much a product of the land migrations around the Mediterranean as it was a product of the Aryan Sea Peoples, whether they were the real Sea Peoples, the Japhetics, or whether they were Egyptians or Phoenicians.  The grandeur achieved by Greece would surpass even Egypt.  And in 330 B.C. the fair-haired and Blond, Alexander the Great, and his Greco-Macedonian troops conquered the Aryan, Darius and the Persian Empire and continued all the way into India and Egypt. 

When the Greeks crumbled from within, Rome inherited the Empire status.  There came lighter and lighter racial admixtures, but the Italics, the founders of Italy, were a Nordic-Aryan people who had migrated from the Alps as early as 2000 B.C., originating from the post-Cappadocian Danube settlement of Aryans.  After Rome, the Germans, the Spanish and the French picked up the Empire banner, then England and then the United States of America. 

The history of Western Man can also be traced by the development of languages and writing and sciences.  All Aryan languages are grouped into one language family called "Indo-European."  And the Indo-European language historically began at Sumer, the first Aryan empire.  Sumerian is the parent language and writing of the European people.  Sumerian pictographs appeared in Troy, and in the Danube area and later developed into the Hieroglyphs of Egypt.  Even Chinese ideograms are a spin off of these pictographs.  From Egypt, the Semites and Phoenicians developed our basic modern alphabet.  It was the Tyrian-Phoenician Kadmos that brought the Alphabet to Greece (Alpha-Beta), again confirming the Phoenicia to Greece migration of the Aryans.

A comparison of the Indo-European alphabets shows their evident evolution.  Lithuanian is an ancient Aryan language.  Indo-Iranic developed into Persian, then into the Sanskrit of India, which has common words with Northern Russia.  Compare the words for mother in English, German, Latin, Greek, Old Persian, and Sanskrit, respectively: mother, mutter, mater, meter, matar, and matar.   Examples of Aryan languages are Sanskrit, Persian, Armenian, Latin, Slavics, Greek, German, French, English, Celtic and their offshoot variants.

Sumer and Babylon gave Greece its system of weights and measures, the 24-hour day, and seven-day week as well as business and physical sciences.  Egypt also provided scientific knowledge to Greece.  They also provided pre-Christian Greece with their blond-haired blue-eyed false religions.  The common thread among these different nations is also revealed in these false religions.  The Assyrians were said to worship Assur, the sun god: the son of Noah.  The Egyptians worshipped Osiris, who is said to have originally been a human king, "the bringer of civilization to Egypt."  In Greece, legendary King Minos was the son of Europa and Zeus. Rome was founded by Romulus the son of Mars.  And Odin, the traditional patriarch of European Royalty was deified in Sweden as late as the eleventh century. 

It becomes more accurate, for historical description, to call  "Aryans" by other sub-grouping names that allow you to identify the peoples or tribes of a country.  Some Aryan sub-grouping names are; Hellenes (though some question that), Italics, Celts, Lombards, Goths, Visigoths, Trojans, Brahmans, Semites, Franks, Huguenots, Saxons, Angles, Vikings, and Normans.  Many more were known by the areas which they occupied: Nordics, Caucasians, Sumerians, Phoenicians, Spartans, etc. 

It is obvious to recognize the Aryan persons of our more recent history, because we have pictures or paintings of them.  It becomes less obvious when we go further back, especially into nations that are today, not Aryan.  Some historical Aryans who lived in nations that today, are non-Aryan nations, would be; Leonardo da Vinci, Plato, King Darius of Persia, Caesar, Alexander the Great, Columbus, Aristotle, Menes: the first king of Egypt, and as pictured throughout medieval Europe with blondish hair and blue eyes, Jesus.  There are of course too many to list, but this cross section will give you a geographical spread. 

The word "Aryan" in Persian or even Sanskrit is Arya, meaning "Noble Race," this is why the word "Aryan" is the correct name for the White race.  Arya is the Sumerian root word from which we get Aristocrat.  On the tomb of Darius the Great, he calls himself "an Arya of Arya descent."  This theme of nobility is carried down through the ages by the Aryan nations.  In Spain, the word "hidalgo" means "nobleman" or literally "son of the Goth."  The term "blueblood" is used to describe Aryan royalty because when an Aryan looks at the blood vessels on the underside of his wrist, they appear to be blue (due to his translucent flesh). 

All of the nobility of Europe is supposed to have come from two ancient Aryan noble houses.  According to European tradition, Odin was one source of that royalty.  Odin is said to be of Trojan descent.  Troy was a stronghold citadel used to monitor Aegean and Mediterranean Sea traffic.  It was first built around 3000 B.C. and destroyed no less than eight times.  It is the fall of the seventh Troy, circa 1100 B.C., that concerns European Royalty.  Homer later wrote of this Troy, with its blond haired, blue eyed and tall heroes, and about its King Priam.  It is from this king, that Odin claimed descent.  Odin's wife claimed descent from Troy's other legendary hero, Brutus.  Brutus, after the defeat of Troy, sailed to Britain, founded New Troy (London) and set up the first laws there. 

Around 250 A.D., descending from Odin and his wife, Frea, come their sons, who became the chieftains of the Teutonic tribes who founded the western Goths as Visigoths.  It was this family that would continue the ancient claim of "the divine right of kings." This divine right began in Sumer, where the kings ruled at the request of the Gods.  It continued in the third dynasty of Egypt, where the Kings ruled as the sons of Re.  In Israel, the divine right of kings continued under Solomon, with his Egyptian influence, and continued under his son Rehoboam.  It also continued under the Holy Roman Empire.  Descendants of Odin would be Rurik, founder of the Russian Empire; the House of Guelph that are the Houses of Hanover, Brunswick, Luneburg, Mecklenburk, Bavaria etc.; the House of Wettin, the Royal families of Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Saxony and Coburg-Gotha.  It is from Saxe-Coburg-Gotha that England's present House of Windsor descended. 

The question to be asked is "From where came Brutus?"  Whether from Sumerian, Egyptian, Phoenician or Israelite descent is debatable, but he was Aryan.  Queen Elizabeth II claims to have descended from Japheth, the son of Noah who was given the isles and took to the sea (Troy to Britain).  Yet elsewhere, English Monarchies have written of their descent from Judah and Shem.  Perhaps it could even be both.

There are physical differences between races and it has been proven that there are mental differences between races.  There are some who claim that there are "character" differences as well.  The physical differences are visible, and therefore obvious.  The question of "character" being inborn is not so easily proven, because every race has its moralists as well as its criminal element.   It is not to say that one race is lower than another, but it is obvious that one race has historically tried to excel to a higher degree of virtue.  

One person's observation: "It has been said that Aryans have these inborn traits:  They protect the family and the high regard for women and the importance of motherhood as well as a settled family life within a moral family-loving existence together.  Aryans respect patriotism, courage and truth.  Aryans are happier in a rural environment because city life has a culturally disintegrative effect.   Aryans covet their culture, part of which is their race.  Aryans believe in the purity of race, a belief resented by the billions of brown people who refuse to understand that our hope of racial preservation does not mean that we hate brown people, or that we are "above" the brown people, but that we see the preservation of our race as being one or two notches above the endangered Spotted Owl.  Aryans have a certain mastery of their own nature, and it is inborn to resist alien genocidal influences.  In India after the caste system was broken and mixing occurred, it was said that the lower caste, although they might look White, were discovered by their unAryan acts." 

Another's observation is: "The mental characteristics of the Nordic race combine a steady temperament and sense of justice and self-discipline with a courageous and inquisitive outlook...with all his good qualities, of which fair mindedness and trustworthiness are the greatest, the Nordic is not only capable of the most good, but also at times he is capable of the most harm."

I would like to identify two other Aryan traits, traits that have prolonged our lack of a peaceful resolution to our cultural problems.  Aryans are self-confident and so, are not intimidated by the cultural incursion of people of other races.  It is good to be confident and not intimidated, yes, but not to the point of letting those of the "Corporate Culture" implement antagonistic erroneous social remedies in the name of equality and harmony.  The other trait that gets us into trouble is our naive generosity.  Generosity is good but should not be carried to the point of violating the Aryan work ethic or creating a government welfare culture that brings the entire social order into financial collapse.  We should never allow our generosity to be used by the "Corporate Culture" to destroy the necessary ethics of our own culture.  Cultural peace among all cultures requires the security of their cultural preservation, and we, the Euro-Culture, are no different.

Aryan controlled nations also have distinctive earmarks that reflect the Aryan mind.  As far back as Sumer, Aryan populations insisted on certain personal rights from their kings, they insisted on property rights, and in all newly created Aryan states, a clear definition of citizenship. This was the Aryan development of the "Nation State," (Natio), that is citizenship by birth (race).   Aryan women, though not always citizens, always had legal standing.  

This system of personal liberty was continued through the subsequent development of this family of nations.  When the Sumerians moved to Egypt, the first king, Menes, established a constitution that allowed for rights to private citizens.  It followed to India and Persia, and became fine tuned in Greece.  These nations, upon their founding, whether Persia in 800 B.C. or the United States in 1789, granted citizenship based on being a White male of a legal age.  And the Aryan nation-states throughout Europe believed it was their obligation to bear arms to defend liberty.  From Aristotle in Greece, to George Mason in America, the right to bear arms was not to be infringed.  As those two men knew, as did all of Europe, that bearing arms was a right, but only for citizens.  This was even reaffirmed after the U.S. "Civil War" in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Twinning verses New Jersey, where a non-Aryan American was denied the right to bear arms.

The development of Aryan governments to respect the rights of their citizens is a predominant theme in Western Nations, but as they fall to alien influences from within, the remnants of those once Aryan systems, become legalistic tyrants.